Wood Mackenzie: Climate Change, New EU Legislation Will Shake Global Energy Outlook

667 views | Akanimo Sampson | January 9, 2020

Wood Mackenzie has warned that climate change and new European Union (EU) legislation are some of the major hidden risks that could change the outlook for the energy world this 2020.

Wood Mackenzie is, however, concerned with forward-looking quality research. It started life in 1923 as a small, relatively unknown, Edinburgh-based stockbroker. By the 1970s, it had become one of the top three stockbrokers in the United Kingdom (UK), renowned for the quality of its equity research.

Its success has always been underpinned by the clear and simple principle of providing trusted research and advice that would make a difference to clients. This was true when the first oil report was published by its equity analysts in 1973 and remains just as relevant today.

Over the past four decades, Wood Mackenzie has drawn upon its heritage to create a global research and consultancy business that has grown alongside the needs of its customers.

Having cultivated deep expertise in upstream oil and gas,’’ we carefully broadened our focus to deliver the same level of detailed insight for every interconnected sector of the energy, chemicals, metals and mining industries we now serve around the world’’, it said on its website.

According to Wood Mackenzie: The EU leads the world in aspiration and policy, and a new regime is cranking up the pace. The green deal, legislation planned for the first quarter of this 2020, envisages a binding commitment to net-carbon neutrality by 2050.

Another EU initiative that could galvanize the global acceptance of carbon taxes is border tariffs. These aim to protect EU-produced goods from cheaper imports with a heavy carbon footprint. The timing for new legislation sets up COP26, the UN climate conference, in Glasgow in December 2020 as a possible turning point for climate change.

Global emissions have risen since the Paris Agreement five years ago. COP26 must commit the 196 Paris signatories to the tougher emissions reductions now needed to get the world on track for a 2 °C pathway.

The US November presidential election could have big implications for energy markets. Domestically, the US oil and gas industry fears a backlash after the halcyon days of this Trump term.

A Democratic victory would change the agenda, the question is how far – to Obama-plus under Joe Biden or that of a hard-core environmentalist?  The Warren proposal to ban fracking hints at the latter, though it’s doubtful Washington has the requisite power to cut the legs off shale gas and oil development.

Globally, a change in administration would be impactful. There is the possibility of re-signing the Paris Agreement; the US-China trade dispute; and US foreign policy which, emboldened by tight oil growth, has reached far and wide under this administration.

For starters, what would the Democrats do about sanctions on Iran and Venezuela that are keeping two million b/d of crude exports off the market? A second Trump term will mean more of the same from these last four years.

No recession, but global GDP growth slid from 2.9% in 2018 to 2.3% in 2019 with the US-China trade dispute weighing on industrial production. Oil demand disappointed, growing at half the rate forecast at the start of the year.

In 2020, we expect a bounce in oil demand growth despite tepid GDP growth of 2.4%. We forecast 1.35 million b/d, more than double the 0.6 million b/d of 2019 (the lowest since 2011). One-offs depressed 2019 whereas 2020 demand will be boosted by marine diesel in China and NGLs for new US petrochemical capacity.

Any repeat of demand disappointment will add to the pressure OPEC+ is under to balance a fundamentally oversupplied market.

The industry has done a dismal job in convincing equity markets and the wider public of its role as the energy transition plays out. The global economy needs oil and gas for some decades yet. It’s up to oil and gas companies in 2020 to present themselves in a better light – as part of the solution rather than the problem.

What’s needed? A plan to maximize cash value for shareholders from the core oil and gas value chain. A plan to measure, reduce and eliminate Scope 1, 2 and even Scope 3 emissions. A plan to adapt to an energy market that is decarbonizing. That will be a start. Repsol, aiming for net-carbon neutrality by 2050, has set a bold example. Other IOCs – and NOCs – need to follow.

Gas, with its low-carbon intensity on burning compared to other fossil fuels, has a critical role to play in balancing the intermittency of solar and wind power through the transition. Global gas demand looks resilient for the next two decades and beyond, and the industry is onto it – planned LNG projects are at record highs.

But policymakers and capital markets are moving fast – will finance be available for the huge investment needed? The European Investment Bank is the latest to withdraw from the sector and will cease funding coal, oil or gas projects after 2021.

The industry needs to work harder in 2020 to demonstrate the benefits of gas and its environmental credentials – in tandem with carbon capture and storage – to ensure that finance for much-needed gas projects doesn’t dry up.

Leave a Comment