Refugee crises are often manufactured by governments. They can be done at the source: war,
famine, rapacious institutions. They can also be manufactured by the refusal of governments
to accept those seeking asylum, sanctuary and refuge.
The latter is very much in evidence in Europe: governments of the European Union are
staring down desperate humans keen to travel into the EU; Belarus, engaging in its own form
of mega-trafficking, has become a conduit for the movement of asylum seekers and migrants
fleeing from Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Afghanistan.
Despite being granted Belarussian visas at considerable cost, many being initially housed in
government hotels, their stay is only intended as temporary. After a brief respite, they are
pushed towards the country’s border with Poland, Latvia and Lithuania. How they get there
is not entirely clear. Some migrants are escorted by uniformed men; others pay additional
fees to be transported. It has also been reported that Belarusian security forces have
furnished instructions and tools – axes and wire cutters – to aid the crossing of the border.
Attempts by Belarussian personnel to destroy border fences near Czeremcha, and disorientate
Polish soldiers with stroboscopes and lasers have also been noted.
Once at the border, the migrants are not allowed to approach any checkpoints to seek asylum.
Nor are they allowed to return to Minsk, threatened by Belarusian border guards who insist
on keeping them there.
Trapped in purgatorial fashion along the border, the migrants find themselves sleeping in
rude conditions and left at the mercy of the elements. There have inadequate supplies, lack
warm clothing and are starving. One estimate has put the death toll at nine.
All political sides are making hay from this suffering. Lukashenko can be accused of being
an opportunistic trafficker of desperate folk and keen on jailing opponents in a desperate bid
to stay in power, but Poland’s Law and Justice Party has happily stirred xenophobic hysteria.
Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki and President Adrzej Duda are part of an administration
that does not shy away from demonising arrivals they associate with terrorists with kinky
characteristics. Doing so supplies an appropriate distraction from accusations of corruption,
galloping inflation and a troubling rise in COVID-19 numbers.
In September, the Minister of the Interior, Mariusz Kamiński, and the National Defence
Minister, Mariusz Błaszczak, appeared at a press conference to show a picture of a man
copulating with a cow. The content had been allegedly found on a phone belonging to an
Afghan migrant lurking in the woods. Spokesman for the Ministry of the Interior, Stanisław
Żaryn, suggested that this was an act “associated with sexual disorders”, signalling a
government campaign to link refugees with zoophilia and paedophilia.
In a gesture of such refined generosity, TVP Info, the main propaganda outlet of the ruling
party, ran a video with a suitably prurient title: “He raped a cow and wanted to enter Poland?”
There were two problems with the footage: the material, recorded on a VHS videotape, was
drawn from bestiality porn from the 1970s; and the animal in question was a mare, not a cow.
Earlier this month, Duda signed a bill into law to construct what was described as “a high-
tech barrier on the border with Belarus to guard against an influx of irregular migrants.” The barrier, valued at some €350 million, was “needed due to increased migratory pressure from
Belarus”. The right to asylum had all but entirely vanished.
Liz Throssell, a spokesperson from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
(OHCHR), is adamant that, “The human rights of migrants and refugees have to come first.”
Unfortunately, she was far from informative on what solutions might be pursued on the
Belarus-EU border. “It is really important they must be respected under international human
rights refugee law, but as for the political dimension to this, I would leave that to others to
address”.
Along the Belarus-Polish border, refugees and migrants have been instrumentalised, their
rights assiduously ignored. Lukashenko has been accused of using a form of “hybrid”
warfare by throwing migrants at the border like willing assailants of rabid intent. The
President of the European Council, Charles Michel, makes the point. “It is a hybrid attack, a
brutal attack, a violent attack and a shameful attack.” Such nasty terminology has turned
those wishing to make their way to the EU into foot soldiers in a political cause they wish to
play no part in. Wedged in between this vicious play of power, these unfortunates trapped on
the border find themselves divested of their humanity, their desires, their wishes.
The EU is also playing its own vile game, falling back upon frontier states who have held
themselves up to be saviours of European civilisation. “It is important that Lukashenko
understands that [the regime’s] behaviour comes with a price,” European Commission
President Ursula von der Leyen warned after talks with US President Joe Biden. Sanctions
are being considered against the airlines that have been accused of facilitating human
trafficking.
There is one final perversion in all this. In essentially condemning human trafficking, the EU
and its counterparts are condemning the right to asylum, which such trafficking aids. With
that sentiment, von der Leyen would regard Oskar Schindler and his more recent equivalent,
Iraq’s Ali Al Jenabi, as traffickers worthy of punishment.
Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He
lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com
