The News Chronicle
  • About Us
  • Advert Rates
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Monday, January 30, 2023
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
  • News
    • Breaking
    • Business
    • Celebs
    • Sports
    • Africa
    • Technology
    • World News
  • Social Diary
    • Events
  • Columns
    • Monday
    • Tuesday
    • Wednesday
    • Thursday
    • Friday
    • Sunday
    • Opinions
    • Editorial: Our Stand
  • TNC TV
  • Interviews
  • Books
    • Reviews
    • Author Profiles
  • Entertainment
  • Gossip
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Breaking
    • Business
    • Celebs
    • Sports
    • Africa
    • Technology
    • World News
  • Social Diary
    • Events
  • Columns
    • Monday
    • Tuesday
    • Wednesday
    • Thursday
    • Friday
    • Sunday
    • Opinions
    • Editorial: Our Stand
  • TNC TV
  • Interviews
  • Books
    • Reviews
    • Author Profiles
  • Entertainment
  • Gossip
No Result
View All Result
The News Chronicle
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Social Diary
  • Columns
  • TNC TV
  • Interviews
  • Books
  • Entertainment

Path Naija News » Editors' Pick » First Thing Must Be Done First If Nigerians Desire A New Constitution For Nigeria

Hameed-Ajibola-Jimoh-Esq.

Hameed-Ajibola-Jimoh-Esq.

First Thing Must Be Done First If Nigerians Desire A New Constitution For Nigeria

Hameed Ajibola Jimoh Esq. by Hameed Ajibola Jimoh Esq.
2 years ago
in Editors' Pick, trending
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
ADVERTISEMENT
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

Nigeria is currently undergoing a process of constitutional amendment of the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended)-herein after referred to as the Constitution. Some Nigerian citizens (including some lawyers) have called for a new Constitution for Nigeria. In as much as this call for a new Constitution might seem worthy, this paper is of the view that for a new Constitution for Nigeria to be assured, first thing must be done first as canvassed and or recommended by this paper, hence, this paper.

It is my humble submission after having read and studied the provisions of the Constitution especially section 9 of the Constitution which provides for the provisions for altering the provisions of the Constitution that the current 1999 Constitution has not and does not envisage a situation of a repeal of the Constitution for a new Constitution. See section 9 of the Constitution and its wording. Nevertheless, in my humble submission, where the citizens desire a new Constitution, it would then be possible either legally or illegally. In the case of an illegal means of achieving a new Constitution, it is a situation where the current Constitution has been suspended by anarchy or for instance in the case of Military takeover (which is by a coup) against democracy or the current democratic government as was experienced in the Nigerian political history- God forbid the recurrence of this situation! I must however state here that this means of constitutional amendment is very undesirable! On the second means of constitutional amendment which is in using the legal means, this involves using the Constitution to achieve this goal.

RelatedPosts

Tinubu Outburst

But We Warned Tinubu About Buhari

January 30, 2023
President Zelensky: How To Lead A Nation Terrorized

Tempting the Banksters: Zelensky Courts US Companies

January 28, 2023
HIMARS

Joining the War Club: Australia’s HIMARS Purchase

January 12, 2023
Aleph Hospitality Continues Africa Expansion With New Upscale Hotel In Ghana
Trending
Aleph Hospitality Continues Africa Expansion With New Upscale Hotel In Ghana

For instance, I humbly submit that what section 9 of the Constitution provides for is alteration of the provisions of the Constitution and not repeal of the Constitution, which provides thus ‘9.—(1) The National Assembly may, subject to the provisions of thissection, alter any of the provisions of this Constitution.(2) An Act of the National Assembly for the alteration of this Constitution,not being an Act to which section 8 of this Constitution applies, shall not bepassed in either House of the National Assembly unless the proposal issupported by the votes of not less than two-thirds majority of all the membersof that House and approved by resolution of the Houses of Assembly of notless than two-thirds of all the States.(3) An Act of the National Assembly for the purpose of altering theprovisions of this section, section 8, or Chapter IV of this Constitution shall notbe passed by either House of the National Assembly unless the proposal isapproved by the votes of not less than four-fifths majority of all the members ofeach House, and also approved by a resolution of the House of Assembly ofnot less than two-thirds of all the States.(4) For the purpose of section 8 of this Constitution and of subsections(2) and (3) of this section, the number of members of each House of the NationalAssembly shall, notwithstanding any vacancy, be deemed to be the number ofmembers specified in sections 48 and 49 of this Constitution.’.

Therefore, in my humble view and submission, for there to be a new Constitution, there is need for an amendment of the provisions of section 9(1) of the Constitution by the use of section 9(2) of the Constitution to read thus ‘9.—(1) The National Assembly mayrepeal this Constitution or subject to the provisions of this section, alter any of the provisions of this Constitution (the new word is underlined by me). Therefore, without any provisions of the Constitution empowering the legislature to repeal the current Constitution or without amending the current Constitution to empower a likely repeal of the Constitution, any such purported repealwithout the Constitutional backing is null and void and of no effect by virtue of section 1 of the Constitution which provides thus ‘1.—(1) This Constitution is Supreme and its provisions shall have binding force on all authorities and persons throughout the Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2) The Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the Government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. (3) If any other Law is inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution, this Constitution shall prevail, and that other Law shall to the extent of the inconsistency be void.’. See the case of ANKPA & ORS v. MAIKARFI & ANOR (2008) LPELR-3776(CA) where the Court of Appeal of Nigeria held on the supremacy of the Nigerian Constitution thus: “It is the law that no provision of any enactment is capable of expanding or subtracting from the elaborate provisions of the Constitution on any subject matter dealt with by the Constitution, this is so because the Constitution is the ground norm. In Attorney-General Abia State v. Attorney-General of the Federation (2002) 6 NWLR Pt. 763 page 264 at 369, Kutigi JSC put it succinctly as follows: “Where the provision in the Act is within the legislative powers of the National Assembly but the Constitution is found to have already made the same or similar provision, then the new provision will be regarded as invalid for duplication and or inconsistency and therefore inoperative The same fate will befall any provision of the Act which seeks to enlarge, curtail or alter any existing provision of the Constitution. The provision or provisions will be treated as unconstitutional and therefore null and void.” Per ABDU ABOKI, JCA (Pp 18 – 19 Paras D – B).

The Peter Obi Factor and the 2023 General Elections
Trending
The Peter Obi Factor and the 2023 General Elections

Finally therefore, in my humble submission, unless the current constitution is amended to allow a repeal of the current Constitution and then, the procedures laid down for such repeal is complied with, any purported repeal of the current Constitution is unconstitutional, null and void and ineffective for being insistent with the current Constitution.

 

Email: hameed_ajibola@yahoo.com

 

Hot Gist

  • Bukayo Saka: The Rising Star at Arsenal FC
  • I am A Northern Christian: Deconstructing Dr Shehu Mahdi
  • “I was disappointed by [Wole Soyinka’s] uncharacteristic silence between 2015 and 2019” – Farooq Kperogi
  • The Story Vault. #1. Love

Tags: constitutionNigerianigerians

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

TB Joshua: A Time To Come And A Time To Leave!

Next Post

Onyeka Onwenu Adds Vocal Prowess To Gabrael Eziashi’s “Woman”

Hameed Ajibola Jimoh Esq.

Hameed Ajibola Jimoh Esq.

Related Posts

Tinubu Outburst

But We Warned Tinubu About Buhari

January 30, 2023
President Zelensky: How To Lead A Nation Terrorized

Tempting the Banksters: Zelensky Courts US Companies

January 28, 2023
HIMARS

Joining the War Club: Australia’s HIMARS Purchase

January 12, 2023
Metaphors of Belligerence: Wars by and against Nature

Metaphors of Belligerence: Wars by and against Nature

January 3, 2023
Gumi’s grating gaffes

Gumi’s grating gaffes

January 3, 2023
February Elections

2023, Nigeria’s year of ghen-ghen

January 2, 2023
Next Post
Onyeka Onwenu Adds Vocal Prowess To Gabrael Eziashi’s “Woman”

Onyeka Onwenu Adds Vocal Prowess To Gabrael Eziashi’s “Woman”

ADVERTISEMENT

What's New?

Tyre Nichols
Opinions

SCORPION/SARS: The Trans-Atlantic Tragedy

by Ozodinukwe Okenwa
January 30, 2023
0

Last weekend in the UnitedStates of America a video footage of the brutality and violence that went with the arrest...

Read more
Wellington Events

At Wellington Events We Pay “Extra” Attention To Details – Nelly Wellington, Creative Director

January 30, 2023
South Africa supports calls for global co-operation to boost trade and address economic challenges and climate change

South Africa supports calls for global co-operation to boost trade and address economic challenges and climate change

January 30, 2023
Prev Next
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • © 2022 The News Chronicle