Elon Musk is being sued by Twitter stockholders for allegedly manipulating the stock price

Ken Ibenne

Ken Ibenne

Twitter’s shareholders have sued billionaire Elon Musk, alleging that his comments after the $44 billion merger agreement manipulated the price of the company’s shares downward. Musk was accused by the stockholders in the complaint of making intentionally unfavorable statements about Twitter in order to depress its stock price.

Musk allegedly purposely pushed down the company’s shares to gain a better price, according to the lawsuit, which was filed in federal district court for Northern California on Wednesday.

According to them, the billionaire’s ruse worked, as Twitter’s value has dropped by $8 billion since the Buyout was disclosed. Before agreeing to the $44 billion transaction, Musk was aware of the bot problem and other challenges that Twitter was facing, according to the sources.

Musk had placed the sale on hold last week pending the determination of the real amount of bots on Twitter, which the business estimated to be fewer than 5%.

What they have to say

“On April 25, 2022, Twitter, Inc. announced that it has agreed to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share, or roughly $44 billion (the “Buyout” or “Proposed Buyout”), according to the shareholders. Without conducting any due diligence, Musk arranged the Twitter Buyout on the weekend of April 23-24, 2022.

  • “The Buyout is only conditioned on approval of Twitter’s shareholders at a meeting to be scheduled this summer, regulatory approval, and closing of the Buyout by October 24, 2022. Before agreeing to buy Twitter for $44 billion, Musk, one of the world’s richest individuals valued at $276 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, and a sophisticated businessman with a phalanx of lawyers and investment bankers, according to the press, specifically agreed to waive detailed due diligence as a condition of the merger agreement.”
  • “At the time, Musk was well aware that Twitter had a certain amount of “fake accounts” and accounts controlled by “bots” and had in fact settled a lawsuit based on the fake accounts for millions of dollars. Musk had tweeted about that issue at Twitter several times in the past, prior to making his offer to acquire Twitter with full knowledge of the bots.
  • “Musk and his team were also well aware of a $809.5 million settlement Twitter entered into in September 2021, in a securities fraud class action alleging Twitter overstated its user numbers and growth rate. All the documents from that case were publicly available to Musk, including a website containing, among other things, the Court’s order denying Twitter’s motion for summary judgment.
  • “Because Tesla’s stock is worth much less now than when Musk agreed to buy Twitter, Musk is at risk of a margin call or a requirement to put up more cash. Musk quickly acted to attempt to mitigate these personal risks to himself by engaging in unlawful conduct that moved the price of Twitter’s stock down,” they added.
  • The shareholders further alleged that “Musk proceeded to make statements, send tweets, and engage in conduct designed to create doubt about the deal and drive Twitter’s stock down substantially in order to create leverage that Musk hoped to use to either back out of the purchase or re-negotiate the buyout price by as much as 25% which, if accomplished, would result in an $11 billion reduction in the Buyout consideration.
  • “As detailed herein, Musk’s conduct was and continues to be illegal, in violation of the California Corporations Code, and contrary to the contractual terms he agreed to in the deal. Musk’s market manipulation worked — Twitter has lost $8 billion in valuation since the Buyout was announced.”

What exactly does this imply?
The billionaire, who has put his $44 billion proposal to buy the firm on hold, believes that Twitter has more spam or bot accounts than it claims.
Musk put the assertion to the test with his 93 million Twitter followers, writing: “Twitter claims that >95 percent of daily active users are real, unique persons.” “Has anyone have a similar experience?”
He then gave users two options for voting: one was a laughing emoji for genuine people, and the other was a bot icon.
As of the time of writing this post, over 1.3 million Twitter users had voted, with 52.5 percent in favor of people and 47.5 percent in favor of bots, after 13 hours of voting. The survey will be open for 24 hours.

Our motto is: ‘We stand for the truth, irrespective of who tells it’. Driven by this philosophy, our aim has been to create a platform where every voice, every narrative – provided they are decently expressed –  is allowed expression. Our belief is that by promoting unfettered competition of ideas, the truth will eventually emerge. Obviously, doing this while resisting any temptation to be captured by any special interest or tendency makes survival as an online newspaper more challenging. This is why we will appreciate any support from our readers:

Bank details:

Account Name: The News Chronicle
Bank: UBA
Account No.: 1022603956 (Naira)

Domiciliary Account  – dollar-denominated:
Bank:  UBA
Account Number: 3002835294 ($)

Please email details of your bank transfer to: publisher@thenews-chronicle.com or send them by WhatsApp to: 07058078841

Professor Jideofor Adibe


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Follow Us For More

Related Posts


What's New?